Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany: a plea for a comprehensive approach

Christian Albert; Carsten Neßhöver; Matthias Schröter; Heidi Wittmer; Aletta Bonn; Benjamin Burkhard; Jens Dauber; Ralf Döring; Christine Fürst; Karsten Grunewald; Dagmar Haase; Bernd Hansjürgens; Jennifer Hauck; Mandy Hinzmann; Thomas Koellner; Tobias Plieninger; Sven Erik Rabe; Irene Ring; Joachim H. Spangenberg; Ulrich Stachow; Henry Wüstemann; Christoph Görg

doi:10.14512/gaia.26.1.8

Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany: a plea for a comprehensive approach

Christian Albert^*, Carsten Neßhöver, Matthias Schröter, Heidi Wittmer, Aletta Bonn, Benjamin Burkhard, Jens Dauber, Ralf Döring, Christine Fürst, Karsten Grunewald, Dagmar Haase, Bernd Hansjürgens, Jennifer Hauck, Mandy Hinzmann, Thomas Koellner, Tobias Plieninger, Sven Erik Rabe, Irene Ring, Joachim H. Spangenberg, Ulrich StachowHenry Wüstemann, Christoph Görg

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

1192 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We present options for a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany (NEA-DE) that could inform decision-makers on the state and trends of ecosystems and ecosystem services. Characterizing a NEA-DE, we argue that its cross-sectoral, integrative approach would have the advantages of increased scientific understanding, addressing specific policy questions and creating science-policy dialogues. Challenges include objections against a utilitarian perspective, reservations concerning power relations, and responsibilities concerning the funding.

Original language	English
Journal	Gaia
Volume	26
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	27-33
Number of pages	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.8
Publication status	Published - 2017

Keywords

Assessment
Biodiversity
Ecosystem services
Science-policy dialogue
Transdisciplinary approach

Access to Document

10.14512/gaia.26.1.8Licence: CC BY

Towards a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany. A Plea for a Comprehensive ApproachFinal published version, 160 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Albert, C., Neßhöver, C., Schröter, M., Wittmer, H., Bonn, A., Burkhard, B., Dauber, J., Döring, R., Fürst, C., Grunewald, K., Haase, D., Hansjürgens, B., Hauck, J., Hinzmann, M., Koellner, T., Plieninger, T., Rabe, S. E., Ring, I., Spangenberg, J. H., ... Görg, C. (2017). Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany: a plea for a comprehensive approach. Gaia, 26(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.8

Albert, C, Neßhöver, C, Schröter, M, Wittmer, H, Bonn, A, Burkhard, B, Dauber, J, Döring, R, Fürst, C, Grunewald, K, Haase, D, Hansjürgens, B, Hauck, J, Hinzmann, M, Koellner, T, Plieninger, T, Rabe, SE, Ring, I, Spangenberg, JH, Stachow, U, Wüstemann, H & Görg, C 2017, 'Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany: a plea for a comprehensive approach', Gaia, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 27-33. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.8

@article{c8a71e4defc74300948b4f6f243d903d,

title = "Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany: a plea for a comprehensive approach",

abstract = "We present options for a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany (NEA-DE) that could inform decision-makers on the state and trends of ecosystems and ecosystem services. Characterizing a NEA-DE, we argue that its cross-sectoral, integrative approach would have the advantages of increased scientific understanding, addressing specific policy questions and creating science-policy dialogues. Challenges include objections against a utilitarian perspective, reservations concerning power relations, and responsibilities concerning the funding.",

keywords = "Assessment, Biodiversity, Ecosystem services, Science-policy dialogue, Transdisciplinary approach",

author = "Christian Albert and Carsten Ne{\ss}h{\"o}ver and Matthias Schr{\"o}ter and Heidi Wittmer and Aletta Bonn and Benjamin Burkhard and Jens Dauber and Ralf D{\"o}ring and Christine F{\"u}rst and Karsten Grunewald and Dagmar Haase and Bernd Hansj{\"u}rgens and Jennifer Hauck and Mandy Hinzmann and Thomas Koellner and Tobias Plieninger and Rabe, {Sven Erik} and Irene Ring and Spangenberg, {Joachim H.} and Ulrich Stachow and Henry W{\"u}stemann and Christoph G{\"o}rg",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.14512/gaia.26.1.8",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "27--33",

journal = "Gaia",

publisher = "Whistle Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a national ecosystem assessment in Germany

T2 - a plea for a comprehensive approach

AU - Albert, Christian

AU - Neßhöver, Carsten

AU - Schröter, Matthias

AU - Wittmer, Heidi

AU - Bonn, Aletta

AU - Burkhard, Benjamin

AU - Dauber, Jens

AU - Döring, Ralf

AU - Fürst, Christine

AU - Grunewald, Karsten

AU - Haase, Dagmar

AU - Hansjürgens, Bernd

AU - Hauck, Jennifer

AU - Hinzmann, Mandy

AU - Koellner, Thomas

AU - Plieninger, Tobias

AU - Rabe, Sven Erik

AU - Ring, Irene

AU - Spangenberg, Joachim H.

AU - Stachow, Ulrich

AU - Wüstemann, Henry

AU - Görg, Christoph

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We present options for a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany (NEA-DE) that could inform decision-makers on the state and trends of ecosystems and ecosystem services. Characterizing a NEA-DE, we argue that its cross-sectoral, integrative approach would have the advantages of increased scientific understanding, addressing specific policy questions and creating science-policy dialogues. Challenges include objections against a utilitarian perspective, reservations concerning power relations, and responsibilities concerning the funding.

AB - We present options for a National Ecosystem Assessment in Germany (NEA-DE) that could inform decision-makers on the state and trends of ecosystems and ecosystem services. Characterizing a NEA-DE, we argue that its cross-sectoral, integrative approach would have the advantages of increased scientific understanding, addressing specific policy questions and creating science-policy dialogues. Challenges include objections against a utilitarian perspective, reservations concerning power relations, and responsibilities concerning the funding.

KW - Assessment

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Science-policy dialogue

KW - Transdisciplinary approach

U2 - 10.14512/gaia.26.1.8

DO - 10.14512/gaia.26.1.8

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85016390087

VL - 26

SP - 27

EP - 33

JO - Gaia

JF - Gaia

IS - 1

ER -