Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation: The PANTHEON International Project

Enrico Poletti, Ole De Backer, Andrea Scotti, Giuliano Costa, Francesco Bruno, Claudia Fiorina, Nicola Buzzatti, Alessia Latini, Tanja K. Rudolph, Mark M.P. van den Dorpel, Christina Brinkmann, Kush P. Patel, Vasileios Panoulas, Joachim Schofer, Arturo Giordano, Marco Barbanti, Damiano Regazzoli, Maurizio Taramasso, Francesco Saia, Andreas BaumbachFrancesco Maisano, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Lars Søndergaard, Azeem Latib, Ignacio J. Amat Santos, Francesco Bedogni, Luca Testa*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with pure severe native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) has been associated with suboptimal results. The available evidence concerns mostly outdated transcatheter heart valves (THVs). Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of new-generation THVs in patients treated for pure severe NAVR. Methods: The PANTHEON (Performance of Currently Available Transcatheter Aortic Valve Platforms in Inoperable Patients With Pure Aortic Regurgitation of a Native Valve) study retrospectively included patients who underwent TAVR with currently available devices (both self-expanding [SE] and balloon expandable [BE]) for severe NAVR. Technical and device success rates as well as a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization at 1 year were evaluated. The rate and clinical consequences of acute transcatheter valve embolization or migration (TVEM) were also considered. Results: A total of 201 patients were included. Overall technical and device success rates were 83.6% and 76.1%, respectively, and did not differ between SE and BE devices. These figures were due mostly to TVEM occurrence (14.6% vs 16.1%; P = 0.47) and residual moderate or greater aortic regurgitation (9.2% vs 10.1%; P = 0.87). Patients who experienced TVEM compared with those without TVEM had a significantly higher incidence of the composite endpoint at 1 year (25.7% vs 15.8%; P = 0.05). Conclusions: Despite improved THV platforms and techniques, TAVR for pure severe NAVR remains a challenging procedure, with significant risk for TVEM. SE and BE platforms demonstrated comparable performance in this setting. (Performance of Currently Available Transcatheter Aortic Valve Platforms in Inoperable Patients With Pure Aortic Regurgitation of a Native Valve [PANTHEON]; NCT05319171)

Original languageEnglish
JournalJ A C C: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume16
Issue number16
Pages (from-to)1974-1985
Number of pages12
ISSN1936-8798
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation

Keywords

  • pure native aortic regurgitation
  • transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  • transcatheter valve embolization

Cite this