Treatment approaches to horses with acute diarrhea admitted to referral institutions: A multicenter retrospective study

Diego E. Gomez, Jamie J. Kopper, David P. Byrne, David L. Renaud, Angelika Schoster, Bettina Dunkel, Luis G. Arroyo, Anna Mykkanen, William F. Gilsenan, Tina H. Pihl, Gabriela Lopez-Navarro, Brett S. Tennent-Brown, Laura D. Hostnik, Mariano Mora-Pereira, Fernando Marques, Jenifer R. Gold, Sally L. DeNotta, Isabelle Desjardins, Allison J. Stewart, Taisuke KurodaEmily Schaefer, Olimpo J. Oliver-Espinosa, Gustavo Ferlini Agne, Benjamin Uberti, Pablo Veiras, Katie M. Delph Miller, Rodolfo Gialleti, Emily John, Ramiro E. Toribio*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background This study aimed to describe and compare therapeutic approaches for horses with acute diarrhea in different geographic regions worldwide. Methods Clinical information was retrospectively collected from diarrheic horses presented to participating institutions between 2016 and 2020, including fluid therapy on admission, antimicrobial drugs, probiotics, anti-endotoxic medications, anti-inflammatory drugs, gastroprotectants, digital cryotherapy, and toxin-binding agents. Seasonal and geographic differences were investigated. Results 1438 horses from 26 participating hospitals from 5 continents were included. On admission, 65% (926/1419) of horses were administered a fluid bolus. Antimicrobial drugs were administered to 55% (792/1419) within the first 24 hours of admission, with penicillin and gentamicin being the most used combination (25%, 198/792). Horses with leukopenia (OR: 2.264, 95%CI: 1.754 to 2.921; P<0.001) or meeting systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (OR: 2.542, 95%CI: 1.919 to 3.368; P<0.001) had higher odds of being administered antimicrobial drugs. Other treatments administered included probiotics (15%, 215/1438), polymyxin B (13%; 187/1438), pentoxifylline (8%; 118/1438), gastroprotectants (44%; 626/ 1419), digital cryotherapy (34%; 489/1435), plasma transfusion (13%; 182/1410) and toxin-binding agents (36%; 515/1438). Limitations Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the rationale for treatment decisions was unavailable, and associations with survival could not be evaluated. Conclusions Treatments varied between hospitals from different geographic regions. Prospective clinical trials are required to evaluate the effects of various treatments on survival.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0313783
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume19
Issue number11
Number of pages19
ISSN1932-6203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Gomez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Cite this