Welfare of pigs on farm

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Gortázar Schmidt, Mette Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Olaf Mosbach-Schulz, Barbara Padalino, Helen Clare Roberts, Karl Stahl, Antonio Velarde, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph WincklerSandra Edwards, Sonya Ivanova, Christine Leeb, Beat Wechsler, Chiara Fabris, Eliana Lima, Yves Van der Stede, Marika Vitali, Hans Spoolder

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract This scientific opinion focuses on the welfare of pigs on farm, and is based on literature and expert opinion. All pig categories were assessed: gilts and dry sows, farrowing and lactating sows, suckling piglets, weaners, rearing pigs and boars. The most relevant husbandry systems used in Europe are described. For each system, highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, as well as related animal-based measures (ABMs), and hazards leading to the welfare consequences. Moreover, measures to prevent or correct the hazards and/or mitigate the welfare consequences are recommended. Recommendations are also provided on quantitative or qualitative criteria to answer specific questions on the welfare of pigs related to tail biting and related to the European Citizen's Initiative ?End the Cage Age?. For example, the AHAW Panel recommends how to mitigate group stress when dry sows and gilts are grouped immediately after weaning or in early pregnancy. Results of a comparative qualitative assessment suggested that long-stemmed or long-cut straw, hay or haylage is the most suitable material for nest-building. A period of time will be needed for staff and animals to adapt to housing lactating sows and their piglets in farrowing pens (as opposed to crates) before achieving stable welfare outcomes. The panel recommends a minimum available space to the lactating sow to ensure piglet welfare (measured by live-born piglet mortality). Among the main risk factors for tail biting are space allowance, types of flooring, air quality, health status and diet composition, while weaning age was not associated directly with tail biting in later life. The relationship between the availability of space and growth rate, lying behaviour and tail biting in rearing pigs is quantified and presented. Finally, the panel suggests a set of ABMs to use at slaughter for monitoring on-farm welfare of cull sows and rearing pigs.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere07421
JournalEFSA Journal
Volume20
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1-319
Number of pages319
ISSN1831-4732
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421

Keywords

  • on-farm pig welfare
  • pig categories
  • husbandry systems
  • welfare consequences
  • animal-based measures
  • end the cage age
  • tail biting

Cite this